Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Accepted Preprint first posted online on 7 May 2008

European Journal of Endocrinology 2008;159:179.

DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0166
Copyright © 2008 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Accepted manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-08-0166v1
159/2/179    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, T.
Right arrow Articles by Conway, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, T.
Right arrow Articles by Conway, G.

RESEARCH

Comparison of bone mineral density and body proportions between women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and women with gonadal dysgenesis

Thang Han, Goswami Deepti, S Trikudanathan, Sarah Creighton and Gerard Conway

T Han, Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
G Deepti, Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
S Trikudanathan, Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
S Creighton, Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
G Conway, Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom

Correspondence: Thang Han, Email: t.s.han{at}doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Objectives: To compare BMD and body proportions between women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) and women with gonadal dysgenesis (GD).

Setting: Adult DSD and POF Clinics (UCLH).

Design: Cross-sectional study of women aged 17-58 years with varying degrees of exposure to sex hormones sex chromosomes. 46 had CAIS, 18 had GD and 46XY [GD(XY)], and 25 had GD and 46,XX [GD(XX)]. Body proportions were analysed.

Outcomes: Oestrogen therapy, karyotype, anthropometry and BMD.

Results: Height differed between groups (F ratio 5.2, P=0.007), with GD(XX) women being shortest (mean+/-SD: 1.66 +/-0.10 m), GD(XY) women tallest (1.74 +/-0.09m) and in between were CAIS women (1.70 +/-0.07 m). Delayed gonadectomy resulted in taller stature in CAIS women (P=0.011). The ratio of lower to upper body length in GD(XY) women was significantly (P=0.001) greater than that of CAIS women. Logistic regression analysis (age, height adjusted ) showed that among women with XY karyotype, GD(XY) were 5.2 times (95% CI: 1.3-20.1, P=0.018) more likely than CAIS women to have a low hip BMD.

Conclusions: Taller stature in late gonadectomised CAIS women suggests oestrogen deficiency in these women prior to gonadectomy. Increased lower body to upper body ratio in GD(XY) women compared to the other groups implies that these subjects have the greatest degree of oestrogen deficiency in puberty. Androgen rather than sex chromosomes may play an important role in cortical bone mineralisation in CAIS women, probably via ER-{alpha} either directly or via aromatisation during critical periods of growth prior to gonadectomy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 European Society of Endocrinology.