Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Accepted Preprint first posted online on 26 August 2008

European Journal of Endocrinology 2008;159:493.

DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0135
Copyright © 2008 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Accepted manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-08-0135v1
159/5/493    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gharib, H.
Right arrow Articles by Paschke, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gharib, H.
Right arrow Articles by Paschke, R.

REVIEW

Thyroid nodules: a review of current guidelines, practices and prospects

Hossein Gharib, Enrico Papini and Ralf Paschke

H Gharib, Dept of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
E Papini, Albano Laziale, Italy
R Paschke, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103 , Germany

Correspondence: Ralf Paschke, Email: pasr{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de

Abstract

In 2006, three major society-sponsored guidelines for thyroid diagnosis and management were published by: the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AACE/AME): the American Thyroid Association (ATA); and the European Thyroid Association (ETA). A careful review of these guidelines reveals that despite many similarities, significant differences are also present, likely reflecting differences in practice patterns, interpretation of existing data, and availability of resources in different regions. The methodology of the GLs is similar, but a few differences in the rating scale make a rapid comparison of the strength of both evidences and recommendations difficult for the use in current clinical practice. Some recommendations are based mostly on experts opinion. Thus, a same recommendation may be based on a different evidence; on the other hand, sometimes the same evidence may induce a different recommendation. Therefore, efforts are needed to produce a few high quality clinical studies to close the evidence gaps in the still controversial fields of thyroid disease and to create a joint task force of the most authoritative societies in the field of thyroid disease in order to reach a common document for clinical practice recommendations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 European Society of Endocrinology.