|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLINICAL STUDY |
R Verkooijen, Nuclear Medicine, LUMC, Leiden, United Kingdom
F Verburg, UMCU, Wuerzburg, Germany
J van Isselt, UMCU, Utrecht, Netherlands
K Lips, UMCU, Utrecht, Netherlands
J Smit, Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
M Stokkel, Nuclear Medicine, LUMC, Leiden, 2300 RC, Netherlands
Correspondence: Marcel Stokkel, Email: m.p.m.stokkel{at}lumc.nl
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to compare the success rate of an uptake-related ablation protocol in which the dose depends on an I-131 24-h neck uptake measurement and a fixed-dose ablation protocol in which the dose depends on tumour stage.
Methods: All differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients with M0 disease who had undergone (near-) total thyroidectomy followed by I-131 ablation were included. In the uptake-related ablation protocol, 1100 MBq (uptake >10%), 1850 MBq (uptake 5-10%) and 2800 MBq (uptake <5%) were used. In the fixed-dosage ablation strategy, 3700 MBq (T1-3, N0 stage) and 5550 MBq (N1 and/or T4 stage) were applied. We used I-131 uptake on whole-body scintigraphy and thyroglobulin (Tg)-off values to evaluate the ablation 6-12 months after treatment. Results: In the uptake-related ablation protocol, 60 out of 139 (43%) patients were successfully treated vs. 111 out of 199 for the fixed-dose ablation protocol (56%) (p = 0.022). The differences were not statistically significant for patients with T4 (p=0.581) and/or N1 (p=0.08) disease or for patients with T4N1 tumour stage (p=0.937).
Conclusion: The fixed-dose I-131 ablation protocol is more effective in ablation of the thyroid remnant in differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients than an uptake-related ablation protocol. This difference is not observed in patients with a N1 and/or T4 tumour stage.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |