Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02293
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 155, Issue 6, 793-799
Copyright © 2006 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turton, J. P G
Right arrow Articles by Dattani, M. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turton, J. P G
Right arrow Articles by Dattani, M. T

CASE REPORT

Evolution of gonadotropin deficiency in a patient with type II autosomal dominant GH deficiency

James P G Turton, Charles R Buchanan1, Iain C A F Robinson3, Simon J B Aylwin2 and Mehul T Dattani

Biochemistry, Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit and London Centre for Paediatric Endocrinology, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK, 1 Departments of Child Health and 2 Endocrinology, Kings College Hospital, London, UK and 3 Division of Molecular Neuroendocrinology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, UK

(Correspondence should be addressed to M T Dattani; Email: mdattani{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk)

Abstract

Background: Type II isolated GH deficiency (IGHD type II) is caused by dominant negative splicing or point mutations of the GH-1 gene. Studies have suggested that dominant mutant GH forms prevent the secretion of wild-type GH, resulting in eventual cell death; surprisingly, some patients with these GH mutations develop other hormonal deficiencies (ACTH, TSH).

Subjects: The proband presented at the age of 2.3 years with IGHD. His father, also known to have been treated for IGHD as a child, had subsequently been lost to follow-up, having remained without treatment during this time. At re-evaluation at the age of 38 years, he complained of lack of stamina and poor libido. Clinical and biochemical assessment confirmed severe GHD, borderline ACTH insufficiency, suboptimal basal and stimulated gonadotropins, and a poor prolactin response to provocation. The basal testosterone concentration was low, and he complained of secondary infertility. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed anterior pituitary hypoplasia in both patients. Genetic testing revealed a heterozygous splicing mutation in GH-1 (intervening sequence-3 + 1G>A) in both patients, known to cause IGHD type II.

Interventions: The proband showed an excellent growth response to recombinant human GH (rhGH). His father, also treated with rhGH, showed improved quality of life on rhGH, but testosterone concentrations continued to decline, necessitating treatment with testosterone with symptomatic benefit but no improvement in semen quality.

Conclusions: This case supports recent experimental and clinical observations suggesting that the cytotoxicity associated with accumulation of dominant negative mutant 17.5 kDa GH causes a form of GHD that can evolve into multiple hormone deficiencies. Hence, patients diagnosed initially with IGHD type II require continued long-term clinical follow-up.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 European Society of Endocrinology.