Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1500649
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 150, Issue 5, 649-653
Copyright © 2004 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H
Right arrow Articles by Harmer, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H
Right arrow Articles by Harmer, C

Articles

Diagnostic 131I whole body scanning after thyroidectomy and ablation for differentiated thyroid cancer

H Taylor, S Hyer, L Vini, B Pratt, G Cook, and C Harmer

Thyroid Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the diagnostic whole body (131)I scan after thyroidectomy and (131)I ablation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of all patients with differentiated thyroid cancer treated in one centre between 1990 and 2000. RESULTS: A total of 153 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic scanning following ablative therapy were identified. This diagnostic scan was positive in 20 patients (13%) and faintly positive in 16 patients (11%). The majority (117 patients) had negative scans. Of the 20 patients with positive scans, four received no further treatment, nine showed no abnormal uptake following a second ablative (131)I dose and seven had uptake in the thyroid bed (six) or in neck nodes (one) after repeat ablation. OUTCOME: In the group with positive scans, the four patients who received no further treatment and the nine with a negative second ablation scan remained disease free during follow-up. No patient with a positive diagnostic scan received additional (131)I therapy which would not otherwise have been given based on the clinical findings, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) values or the presence of anti-Tg antibodies. Ten of the patients with negative scans developed recurrent disease which was always detected clinically or by a rising serum Tg value. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic whole body (131)I scans add little extra information and in our experience do not influence patient management. They should be reserved for patients in whom serum Tg levels are unreliable because of the presence of antibodies or when there is clinical suspicion of tumour.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 European Society of Endocrinology.