| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Articles |
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, School of Medicine, Ankara University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey. sevim.gullu@temd.org.tr
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the validity of current remission criteria in acromegaly, a random GH level of <2.5 microg/l, a glucose-suppressed GH level of <1 microg/l and a normal IGF-I level. DESIGN: In forty-one patients treated for acromegaly (23 males and 18 females, 20-69 years) and 94 healthy subjects (50 males and 44 females, 20-78 years), basal GH and IGF-I levels and nadir GH levels after 75 g oral glucose were evaluated in decade blocks; these were assayed by sensitive immunoradiometric assays. RESULTS: Basal GH levels varied widely from 0.022 to 10.4 in healthy subjects and were >2.5 microg/l in 19%. The mean post-glucose GH nadir was 0.067+/-0.009 microg/l (range 0.003-0.4 microg/l) and the upper limit of the GH nadir was 0.26 microg/l (means+2 S.D.) in healthy subjects. Thirty-five patients with acromegaly had high-for-age IGF-I levels in relation to our healthy subjects. In this group, 15 (42.9%) patients had basal GH levels of <2.5 microg/l, 14 (40%) patients had nadir GH levels of <1 microg/l, and three (8.6%) patients had GH suppression to <0.26 microg/l which was defined as normal GH suppression in our healthy subjects. Only six patients with acromegaly had normal-for-age IGF-I levels and all of these patients had basal GH levels of <2.5 microg/l and all but one had nadir GH levels of <0.26 microg/l. CONCLUSIONS: A basal or random GH level of <2.5 microg/l is not a reliable criterion for remission in acromegaly and the currently accepted normal upper limit of 1 microg/l for post-glucose GH suppression is too high. Post-glucose nadir GH levels, measured with sensitive assays, can be <1.0 microg/l in 40% and basal GH levels can be <2.5 microg/l in 43% of the active acromegalic patients. IGF-I levels appeared to correlate better with a nadir GH cut-off of 0.26 microg/l rather than 1 microg/l in the determination of disease activity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Colao and G. Lombardi Should We Still Use Glucose-Suppressed Growth Hormone Levels for the Evaluation of Acromegaly? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 1181 - 1182. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Arafat, M. Mohlig, M. O. Weickert, F. H. Perschel, J. Purschwitz, J. Spranger, C. J. Strasburger, C. Schofl, and A. F. H. Pfeiffer Growth Hormone Response during Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: The Impact of Assay Method on the Estimation of Reference Values in Patients with Acromegaly and in Healthy Controls, and the Role of Gender, Age, and Body Mass Index J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 1254 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Markkanen, T. Pekkarinen, M. J. Valimaki, H. Alfthan, R. Kauppinen-Makelin, T. Sane, and U.-H. Stenman Effect of Sex and Assay Method on Serum Concentrations of Growth Hormone in Patients with Acromegaly and in Healthy Controls Clin. Chem., March 1, 2006; 52(3): 468 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Ronchi, V. Varca, C. Giavoli, P. Epaminonda, P. Beck-Peccoz, A. Spada, and M. Arosio Long-Term Evaluation of Postoperative Acromegalic Patients in Remission with Previous and Newly Proposed Criteria J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1377 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
